The Eckman-Hilton argument and higher operads
M.A. Batanin

TL;DR
This paper extends the classical Eckmann-Hilton argument to higher dimensions using categorical schemes, applying it to $n$-operads and symmetric operads to relate algebra categories.
Contribution
It introduces a categorical framework for higher-dimensional Eckmann-Hilton arguments and constructs a symmetrisation functor for $n$-operads, linking them to symmetric operads.
Findings
Established a categorical scheme for Eckmann-Hilton type arguments in higher dimensions.
Constructed a symmetrisation functor from $n$-operads to symmetric operads.
Provided an explicit formula for the symmetrisation functor under mild conditions.
Abstract
The classical Eckmann-Hilton argument shows that two monoid structures on a set, such that one is a homomorphism for the other, coincide and, moreover, the resulting monoid is commutative. This argument immediately gives a proof of the commutativity of the higher homotopy groups. A reformulation of this argument in the language of higher categories is: suppose we have a one object, one arrow 2-category, then its -set is a commutative monoid. A similar argument due to A.Joyal and R.Street shows that a one object, one arrow tricategory is `the same' as a braided monoidal category. In this paper we begin to investigate how one can extend this argument to arbitrary dimension. We provide a simple categorical scheme which allows us to formalise the Eckman-Hilton type argument in terms of the calculation of left Kan extensions in an appropriate 2-category. Then we apply this scheme to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
