Modular categories and orbifold models II
Alexander Kirillov Jr

TL;DR
This paper extends the understanding of orbifold models in conformal field theory by describing the representation categories of fixed point algebras in non-holomorphic cases using tensor categories, building on previous holomorphic results.
Contribution
It provides a partial answer to the construction of representation categories of fixed point algebras for non-holomorphic vertex operator algebras, emphasizing tensor category methods.
Findings
Representation category of V^G determined by twisted V-modules and G-action
Avoids VOA techniques, using tensor categories instead
Partial extension of holomorphic case results to non-holomorphic cases
Abstract
This is a continuation of the paper "Modular tensor categories and orbifold theories", arXiv:math.QA/0104242. It discusses orbifold models of conformal filed theory, or, in mathematical language, question of constructing the category of representations of the fixed point algebra for a given vertex operator algebra with an action of a finite group . The previous paper gave a proof of well-known conjecture of Dijkgraaf-Vafa-Verlinde-Verlinde giving a complete answer to this question in the holomorphic case (when has a unique simple module, itself) under the assumption that categories of rrepresentations of , are modular tensor categories. In the current paper, we give a partial answer in non-holomorphic case. In particular, we show that the category of representations of is completely determined by the category of twisted -modules together with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Topics in Algebra
