Homogeneous decoherence functionals in standard and history quantum mechanics
Oliver Rudolph, J.D.M. Wright

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the mathematical properties of decoherence functionals in history quantum mechanics, focusing on standard and homogeneous cases, and establishes their representations and limitations within Hilbert space frameworks.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the standard and homogeneous decoherence functionals, including their representations and the non-existence of certain extensions, advancing the mathematical understanding of history quantum theories.
Findings
Proves the non-existence of finitely valued extensions for the standard decoherence functional.
Derives a representation of the standard decoherence functional as an unbounded quadratic form.
Establishes an ILS-type representation for the standard decoherence functional.
Abstract
General history quantum theories are quantum theories without a globally defined notion of time. Decoherence functionals represent the states in the history approach and are defined as certain bivariate complex-valued functionals on the space of all histories. However, in practical situations -- for instance in the history formulation of standard quantum mechanics -- there often is a global time direction and the homogeneous decoherence functionals are specified by their values on the subspace of homogeneous histories. In this work we study the analytic properties of (i) the standard decoherence functional in the history version of standard quantum mechanics and (ii) homogeneous decoherence functionals in general history theories. We restrict ourselves to the situation where the space of histories is given by the lattice of projections on some Hilbert space H. Among other things we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
