From Stationary Phase to Steepest Descent
Spyridon Kamvissis

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the differences between nonlinear stationary phase and steepest descent methods, emphasizing the role of steepest descent contours, primarily using the nonlinear Schrödinger equation as a model.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of nonlinear stationary phase and steepest descent techniques, highlighting the significance of steepest descent contours in solving nonlinear problems.
Findings
Distinction between nonlinear stationary phase and steepest descent methods
Importance of steepest descent contours in nonlinear analysis
Application to nonlinear Schrödinger and KdV equations
Abstract
Our aim here is to clarify the distinction between the nonlinear-stationary-phase idea and the nonlinear-steepest-descent idea, stressing the importance of actual steepest-descent contours in some problems. We mostly use the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation as our working model, but we also digress to the KdV equation at some point. This is a slightly revised version of a review paper that will appear in the forthcoming volume (Contemporary Mathematics, AMS) honoring Percy Deift.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNonlinear Waves and Solitons · Nonlinear Photonic Systems · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
