Admissible Transformations and Normalized Classes of Nonlinear Schroedinger Equations
Roman O. Popovych, Michael Kunzinger, Homayoon Eshraghi

TL;DR
This paper develops new techniques for classifying symmetries of nonlinear Schrödinger equations, providing a comprehensive group classification and introducing normalized subclasses to facilitate the analysis of admissible transformations.
Contribution
It introduces the concepts of conditional equivalence groups and normalized classes, and applies these to exhaustively classify symmetries of (1+1)- and (1+2)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equations.
Findings
Complete group classification of (1+1)-dimensional Schrödinger equations with nonlinearities and potentials.
Classification of (1+2)-dimensional cubic Schrödinger equations with potentials.
Development of effective techniques for symmetry analysis of differential equations.
Abstract
The theory of group classification of differential equations is analyzed, substantially extended and enhanced based on the new notions of conditional equivalence group and normalized class of differential equations. Effective new techniques are proposed. Using these, we exhaustively describe admissible point transformations in classes of nonlinear (1+1)-dimensional Schroedinger equations, in particular, in the class of nonlinear (1+1)-dimensional Schroedinger equations with modular nonlinearities and potentials and some subclasses thereof. We then carry out a complete group classification in this class, representing it as a union of disjoint normalized subclasses and applying a combination of algebraic and compatibility methods. Moreover, we introduce the complete classification of (1+2)-dimensional cubic Schroedinger equations with potentials. The proposed approach can be applied to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
