Chetaev vs. vakonomic prescriptions in constrained field theories with parametrized variational calculus
Enrico Bibbona, Lorenzo Fatibene, Mauro Francaviglia

TL;DR
This paper compares Chetaev and vakonomic approaches in constrained field theories, demonstrating how parametrized variational calculus derives their equations and highlighting an example where the non-holonomic method yields unphysical results.
Contribution
It introduces a framework using parametrized variational calculus to derive and compare Chetaev and vakonomic field equations, clarifying their physical relevance.
Findings
Vakonomic and Chetaev variations are characterized within the framework.
Parametrized variational calculus effectively derives their respective field equations.
An example shows the non-holonomic method can produce unphysical results.
Abstract
Starting from a characterization of admissible Cheataev and vakonomic variations in a field theory with constraints we show how the so called parametrized variational calculus can help to derive the vakonomic and the non-holonomic field equations. We present an example in field theory where the non-holonomic method proved to be unphysical.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
