Rigorous perturbation theory versus variational methods in the spectral study of carbon nanotubes
Horia D. Cornean (MATH. Dept., Aalborg University), Thomas G. Pedersen, (Physics, Nanotech. Dept., Aalborg University), Benjamin Ricaud (CPT)

TL;DR
This paper compares rigorous perturbation theory and variational methods for analyzing the spectral properties of carbon nanotubes, demonstrating strong agreement at small radii based on recent experimental data.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between two analytical approaches for nanotube spectra, highlighting their accuracy and applicability at small radii.
Findings
Excellent agreement between methods at small radii
Perturbation theory is validated against variational results
Analytic approximations match experimental data closely
Abstract
Recent two-photon photo-luminescence experiments give accurate data for the ground and first excited excitonic energies at different nanotube radii. In this paper we compare the analytic approximations proved in \cite{CDR}, with a standard variational approach. We show an excellent agreement at sufficiently small radii.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
