Nonholonomic systems via moving frames: Cartan equivalence and Chaplygin Hamiltonization

TL;DR

This paper explores the geometric structure of nonholonomic systems using moving frames, applying Cartan's method and studying Hamiltonization conditions, with examples including Chaplygin systems like the rubber sphere.

Contribution

It applies Cartan's equivalence method to nonholonomic systems and analyzes Hamiltonization criteria for G-Chaplygin systems with new insights and examples.

Findings

Differential invariants computed for Engel distributions.

Hamiltonization of the rubber sphere under certain conditions.

Obstructions to Hamiltonization identified for specific systems.

Abstract

A nonholonomic system consists of a configuration space Q, a Lagrangian L, and an nonintegrable constraint distribution H, with dynamics governed by Lagrange-d'Alembert's principle. We present two studies both using adapted moving frames. In the first study we apply Cartan's method of equivalence to investigate the geometry underlying a nonholonomic system. As an example we compute the differential invariants for a nonholonomic system on a four-dimensional configuration manifold endowed with a rank two (Engel) distribution. In the second part we study G-Chaplygin systems. These are systems where the constraint distribution is given by a connection on a principal fiber bundle with total space Q and base space S=Q/G, and with a G-equivariant Lagrangian. These systems compress to an almost Hamiltonian system on $T^{*}S$. Under an $s \in S$ dependent time reparameterization a number of compressed systems become Hamiltonian. A necessary condition for Hamiltonization is the existence of an invariant measure on the original system. Assuming an invariant measure we describe the obstruction to Hamiltonization. Chaplygin's "rubber" sphere, a ball with unequal inertia coefficients rolling without slipping or spinning (about the vertical axis) on a plane is Hamiltonizable when compressed to $T^{*}SO(3)$. Finally we discuss reduction of internal symmetries. Chaplygin's "marble" (where spinning is allowed) is not Hamiltonizable when compressed to $T^{*}SO(3)$; we conjecture that it is also not Hamiltonizable when reduced to $T^{*}S^{2}$.