
TL;DR
The paper discusses the inverse crime, which occurs when the same models are used for data synthesis and inversion in inverse problems, highlighting its triviality and the importance of avoiding it.
Contribution
It clarifies the concept of the inverse crime and emphasizes its implications in inverse problem methodologies.
Findings
Using identical models for synthesis and inversion can lead to overly optimistic results.
Avoiding the inverse crime is crucial for realistic inverse problem analysis.
The paper underscores the importance of model discrepancy in inverse problem solutions.
Abstract
The inverse crime occurs when the same (or very nearly the same) theoretical ingredients are employed to synthesize as well as to invert data in an inverse problem. This act has been qualified as trivial and therefore to be avoided by Colton and Kress.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTheoretical and Computational Physics · Forensic and Genetic Research
