Algebraic and Dirac-Hestenes Spinors and Spinor Fields
Waldyr A. Rodrigues Jr

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the mathematical foundations of Hestenes' approach to Dirac spinor fields, proposing precise definitions for algebraic and Dirac-Hestenes spinor fields to clarify conceptual misunderstandings.
Contribution
It introduces rigorous definitions for algebraic and Dirac-Hestenes spinor fields as equivalence classes, addressing inconsistencies in previous formulations and setting the stage for a comprehensive geometric framework.
Findings
Identifies conflicts in Hestenes' original spinor definition with Fierz identities.
Proposes new definitions for algebraic and Dirac-Hestenes spinor fields.
Provides detailed Clifford algebra results to support the theoretical framework.
Abstract
Almost all presentations of Dirac theory in first or second quantization in Physics (and Mathematics) textbooks make use of covariant Dirac spinor fields. An exception is the presentation of that theory (first quantization) offered originally by Hestenes and now used by many authors. There, a new concept of spinor field (as a sum of non homogeneous even multivectors fields) is used. However, a carefully analysis (detailed below) shows that the original Hestenes definition cannot be correct since it conflicts with the meaning of the Fierz identities. In this paper we start a program dedicated to the examination of the mathematical and physical basis for a comprehensive definition of the objects used by Hestenes. In order to do that we give a preliminary definition of algebraic spinor fields (ASF) and Dirac-Hestenes spinor fields (DHSF) on Minkowski spacetime as some equivalence classes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
