On the equivalence of Daviau's space Clifford algebraic, Hestenes' and Parra's formulations of (real) Dirac theory
Bertfried Fauser

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the equivalence of various formulations of the Dirac theory—Clifford algebraic, Hestenes', and Parra's—showing they are interconnected through isomorphisms and automorphisms, unifying different mathematical perspectives.
Contribution
It proves that Daviau's map is an isomorphism linking matrix and Clifford algebra formulations and shows the equivalence of Hestenes' and Parra's formulations to Daviau's approach.
Findings
Daviau's map theta is an isomorphism between C^4 and M_2(C)
Hestenes' and Parra's formulations are equivalent to Daviau's Clifford algebra formulation
The connection involves outer automorphisms and relates left/right actions to bi-module structures
Abstract
Recently Daviau showed the equivalence of ordinary matrix based Dirac theory -formulated within a spinor bundle S_x \simeq C^4_x-, to a Clifford algebraic formulation within space Clifford algebra CL(R^3,delta) \simeq M_2(C) \simeq P \simeq Pauli algebra (matrices) \simeq H \oplu H \simeq biquaternions. We will show, that Daviau's map theta : C^4 \mapsto M_2(C) is an isomorphism. Furthermore it is shown that Hestenes' and Parra's formulations are equivalent to Daviau's space Clifford algebra formulation, which however uses outer automorphisms. The connection between such different formulations is quite remarkable, since it connects the left and right action on the Pauli algebra itself viewed as a bi-module with the left (resp. right) action of the enveloping algebra P^e \simeq P\otimes P^T on P. The isomorphism established in this article and given by Daviau's map does clearly show that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
