Morita equivalence and T-duality (or B versus $\Theta$)
B. Pioline (Ecole Polytechnique), A. Schwarz (UCDavis, IHES)

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the relationship between Morita equivalence and T-duality in non-commutative Yang-Mills theory, resolving previous puzzles by proposing modified maps and symmetries, and deriving a T-duality invariant BPS mass formula.
Contribution
It provides two resolutions to the Morita equivalence and T-duality correspondence, introducing a true symmetry that trades magnetic backgrounds for non-commutativity and deriving an invariant BPS mass formula.
Findings
Resolved the mismatch between Morita equivalence and T-duality transformations.
Identified a true symmetry allowing exchange of magnetic background and non-commutativity.
Derived a BPS mass formula invariant under multiple dualities and symmetries.
Abstract
T-duality in M(atrix) theory has been argued to be realized as Morita equivalence in Yang-Mills theory on a non-commutative torus (NCSYM). Even though the two have the same structure group, they differ in their action since Morita equivalence makes crucial use of an additional modulus on the NCSYM side, the constant Abelian magnetic background. In this paper, we reanalyze and clarify the correspondence between M(atrix) theory and NCSYM, and provide two resolutions of this puzzle. In the first of them, the standard map is kept and the extra modulus is ignored, but the anomalous transformation is offset by the M(atrix) theory ``rest term''. In the second, the standard map is modified so that the duality transformations agree, and a symmetry is found to eliminate the spurious modulus. We argue that this is a true symmetry of supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory on a non-commutative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
