Cosmology vs. Holography
Nemanja Kaloper, Andrei Linde

TL;DR
This paper examines various holographic principles in cosmology, highlighting their limitations across different universe models and arguing that they do not constrain inflationary scenarios or universes with gravitational collapse.
Contribution
It critically analyzes existing holographic bounds, demonstrating their inapplicability to open, flat, and closed universes with matter and a small negative cosmological constant.
Findings
Holographic bounds do not apply universally to all universe types.
Constraints from holography are consistent with inflationary cosmology.
Holographic entropy bounds relate to black hole entropy limits.
Abstract
The most radical version of the holographic principle asserts that all information about physical processes in the world can be stored on its surface. This formulation is at odds with inflationary cosmology, which implies that physical processes in our part of the universe do not depend on the boundary conditions. Also, there are some indications that the radical version of the holographic theory in the context of cosmology may have problems with unitarity and causality. Another formulation of the holographic principle, due to Fischler and Susskind, implies that the entropy of matter inside the post-inflationary particle horizon must be smaller than the area of the horizon. Their conjecture was very successful for a wide class of open and flat universes, but it did not apply to closed universes. Bak and Rey proposed a different holographic bound on entropy which was valid for closed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
