Breakdown of Cluster Decomposition in Instanton Calculations of the Gluino Condensate
T.J. Hollowood (Los Alamos, Swansea), V.V. Khoze (Durham), W. Lee (Los, Alamos), M.P. Mattis (Los Alamos)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines instanton calculations of the gluino condensate in supersymmetric gauge theories, revealing that the strong-coupling approach's key assumption, cluster decomposition, is invalid, leading to questions about its validity.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the cluster decomposition principle fails in multi-instanton sectors, challenging the validity of the strong-coupling instanton calculation of the gluino condensate.
Findings
Weak-coupling instanton calculation yields c=1
Strong-coupling instanton calculation yields a different value
Cluster decomposition is invalid in multi-instanton sectors
Abstract
A longstanding puzzle concerns the calculation of the gluino condensate <{tr\lambda^2\over 16\pi^2}> = c\Lambda^3 in N=1 supersymmetric SU(N) gauge theory: so-called weak-coupling instanton (WCI) calculations give c=1, whereas strong-coupling instanton (SCI) calculations give, instead, c=2[(N-1)!(3N-1)]^{-1/N}. By examining correlators of this condensate in arbitrary multi-instanton sectors, we cast serious doubt on the SCI calculation of <{tr\lambda^2\over 16\pi^2}> by showing that an essential step --- namely cluster decomposition --- is invalid. We also show that the addition of a so-called Kovner-Shifman vacuum (in which <{tr\lambda^2\over 16\pi^2}> = 0) cannot straightforwardly resolve this mismatch.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
