
TL;DR
This paper analyzes intersecting brane configurations at arbitrary angles using the DBI action, classifying them into marginal and non-marginal types, and deriving intersection rules consistent with supergravity results.
Contribution
It provides a systematic classification of intersecting branes at angles via the DBI action, revealing angle structures and intersection rules for similar and non-similar branes.
Findings
Marginal configurations are specified by SU(2) angles.
Non-marginal configurations are specified by Sp(2) angles.
Orthogonal configurations are the only non-trivial intersections for non-similar branes.
Abstract
In this paper we investigate about several configurations of two intersecting branes at arbitrary angles. We choose the viewpoint of a brane source and a brane probe and use the low-energy dynamics of p-branes. For each p-brane this dynamics is governed by a generic DBI action including a WZ term, which couples to the SUGRA background of the other brane. The analysis naturally reveals two types of configurations: the ``marginal'' and the ``non-marginal'' ones. We specify possible configurations for a pair of similar or non-similar branes in either of these two categories. In particular, for two similar branes at angles, this analysis reveals that all the marginal configurations are specified by SU(2) angles while the non-marginal configurations are specified by angles. On the other hand, we find that no other configuration of two intersecting branes at non-trivial angles can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
