On Different Criteria for Confinement
Masud Chaichian, Tatsuo Kobayashi

TL;DR
This paper compares two criteria for supersymmetric confinement, analyzing their critical points and how they relate in theories with discrete symmetries and superpotentials, providing insights into the conditions for confinement.
Contribution
It identifies and compares the critical points of two confinement criteria in supersymmetric theories and explores their connection through symmetry and superpotential considerations.
Findings
Critical point for superconvergence: $eta_0/4$
Critical point for Seiberg formulation: $eta_0/4$ in large $N_c$, $N_f$ limit
Connection between criteria via symmetry limits
Abstract
We compare two approaches in supersymmetric confinement, the Seiberg formulation and the superconvergence rule. For the latter, the critical point is in the Landau gauge. We find is the critical point for most of confining theories without a tree-level superpotential in the Seiberg formulation, in particular, in the large and limit. We show how confining theories with a discrete symmetry and a tree-level superpotential connect these two critical points: the large and small discrete symmetry limits correspond to the critical points and , respectively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
