On confinement in a light-cone Hamiltonian for QCD
Hans-Christian Pauli (Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Postfach, 10 39 80, D-69029 Heidelberg.)

TL;DR
This paper develops a non-perturbative, symmetry-preserving Hamiltonian approach for QCD in light-cone gauge, enabling the retrieval of many-body gauge field effects from a simplified quark-antiquark framework, with potential implications for confinement.
Contribution
It introduces a novel non-perturbative method using iterated resolvents and discretized light-cone quantization to analyze QCD without traditional truncations, maintaining all symmetries.
Findings
Higher Fock-space amplitudes can be self-consistently derived from quark-antiquark solutions.
The approach respects all Lagrangian symmetries, including covariance and gauge invariance.
The method suggests a mechanism for confinement through the interplay of the QCD scale and additional mass scales.
Abstract
The canonical front form Hamiltonian for non-Abelian SU(N) gauge theory in 3+1 dimensions and in the light-cone gauge is mapped non-perturbatively on an effective Hamiltonian which acts only in the Fock space of a quark and an antiquark. Emphasis is put on the many-body aspects of gauge field theory, and it is shown explicitly how the higher Fock-space amplitudes can be retrieved self-consistently from solutions in the -space. The approach is based on the novel method of iterated resolvents and on discretized light-cone quantization driven to the continuum limit. It is free of the usual perturbative Tamm-Dancoff truncations in particle number and coupling constant and respects all symmetries of the Lagrangian including covariance and gauge invariance. Approximations are done to the non-truncated formalism. Together with vertex as opposed to Fock-space regularization, the method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
