On the Supergravity Gauge theory Correspondence and the Matrix Model
S. P. de Alwis

TL;DR
This paper reviews the derivation and validity of DLCQ Matrix models, their relation to supergravity and AdS/CFT duality, and clarifies the roles of non-renormalization theorems and higher order corrections.
Contribution
It clarifies the assumptions and limitations of DLCQ Matrix models and compares their relation to supergravity and Maldacena's conjecture, especially in finite N regimes.
Findings
Finite N effects in DLCQ Matrix models analyzed
Comparison between Matrix model compactification and AdS/CFT duality
Role of branes in different duality contexts explained
Abstract
We review the assumptions and the logic underlying the derivation of DLCQ Matrix models. In particular we try to clarify what remains valid at finite , the role of the non-renormalization theorems and higher order terms in the supergravity expansion. The relation to Maldacena's conjecture is also discussed. In particular the compactification of the Matrix model on is compared to the super Yang-Mills duality, and the different role of the branes in the two cases is pointed out.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
