Reply to comment by Zaslavskii on extremal black hole action
A. Ghosh (CERN), P. Mitra (Saha Inst)

TL;DR
This paper clarifies a misunderstanding about the relevance of extremal black hole configurations by emphasizing the correct inequality that distinguishes extremal from non-extremal black hole actions.
Contribution
It corrects Zaslavskii's misinterpretation by highlighting the essential difference in inequalities governing extremal and non-extremal black hole actions.
Findings
Reaffirmed the irrelevance of extremal black hole configurations
Clarified the correct inequality distinguishing extremal from non-extremal cases
Refuted Zaslavskii's misunderstanding
Abstract
It is shown that Zaslavskii's misunderstanding of our published proof of the irrelevance of all extremal black hole configurations (whether with equal charge and mass or not) rests on his refusal to see the essential difference between the correct inequality governing extremal and non-extremal actions and his incorrect version.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
