Why Matrix Theory is Hard
Michael R. Douglas, Hirosi Ooguri

TL;DR
This paper tests the finite N matrix theory conjecture on an ALE space using Sen and Seiberg's prescription, revealing discrepancies with supergravity predictions and discussing potential resolutions.
Contribution
It applies a recent matrix theory construction to a new background and identifies a sharper discrepancy, exploring subtleties in light-front quantization.
Findings
Discrepancy between matrix theory and supergravity predictions
Identification of subtleties in light-front quantization
Potential avenues for resolving the discrepancy
Abstract
Recently Sen and Seiberg gave a prescription for constructing the matrix theory in any superstring background. We use their prescription to test the finite N matrix theory conjecture on an ALE space. Based on our earlier work with Shenker, we find a sharper discrepancy between matrix theory computation and supergravity prediction. We discuss subtleties in the light-front quantization which may lead to a resolution to the discrepancy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
