On the string interpretation of M(atrix) theory
L. Bonora, C.S. Chu

TL;DR
This paper explores the string interpretation of M(atrix) theory, showing how quantum numbers in 1+1D supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory relate to string configurations in IIA and IIB string theories, emphasizing SL(2,Z) symmetry.
Contribution
It demonstrates the correspondence between quantum numbers in 1+1D SYM and string configurations in IIA and IIB theories, highlighting the role of SL(2,Z) symmetry.
Findings
Quantum numbers in SYM match string configurations in IIA and IIB theories.
SL(2,Z) symmetry relates IIB string configurations to IIA framework.
Quantum moduli space explains the emergence of string states.
Abstract
It has been proposed recently that, in the framework of M(atrix) theory, N=8 supersymmetric U(N) Yang-Mills theory in 1+1 dimensions gives rise to type IIA long string configurations. We point out that the quantum moduli space of gives rise to two quantum numbers, which fit very well into the M(atrix) theory. The two quantum numbers become familiar if one switches to a IIB picture, where they represent configurations of D-strings and fundamental strings. We argue that, due to the SL(2,Z) symmetry, of the IIB theory, such quantum numbers must represent configurations that are present also in the IIA framework.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
