The Background Field Method for N = 2 Super Yang-Mills Theories in Harmonic Superspace
I. L. Buchbinder, E. I. Buchbinder, S. M. Kuzenko, B. A. Ovrut

TL;DR
This paper develops a background field method for N=2 super Yang-Mills theories in harmonic superspace, analyzing ghost structures and one-loop effective actions, with implications for N=4 theories and Seiberg's effective action.
Contribution
It introduces a novel background field approach in harmonic superspace for N=2 super Yang-Mills theories, detailing ghost structures and one-loop effective actions, and explores implications for N=4 theories.
Findings
Ghost structure includes fermionic and bosonic hypermultiplets in the adjoint representation.
One-loop effective action is determined solely by ghost corrections in pure super Yang-Mills.
In N=2 SU(2) theory, the low-energy one-loop effective action matches Seiberg's holomorphic effective action.
Abstract
The background field method for N=2 super Yang-Mills theories in harmonic superspace is developed. The ghost structure of the theory is investigated. It is shown that the ghosts include two fermionic real omega-hypermultiplets (Faddeev-Popov ghosts) and one bosonic real omega-hypermultiplet (Nielsen-Kallosh ghost), all in the adjoint representation of the gauge group. The one-loop effective action is analysed in detail and it is found that its structure is determined only by the ghost corrections in the pure super Yang-Mills theory. As applied to the case of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, realized in terms of N=2 superfields, the latter result leads to the remarkable conclusion that the one-loop effective action of the theory does not contain quantum corrections depending on the N=2 gauge superfield only. We show that the leading low-energy contribution to the one-loop effective action in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
