Some Non-Renormalization Theorems for Higher Derivative Operators
Michael Dine

TL;DR
This paper proves that certain four-derivative terms in the effective action of a supersymmetric matrix model are not renormalized, supporting its potential as a non-perturbative definition of M-theory.
Contribution
It provides a perturbative proof of non-renormalization theorems for higher derivative operators in a supersymmetric matrix model.
Findings
Four-derivative terms are not renormalized in the model.
Supports the model's role in non-perturbative M-theory.
Provides a perturbative validation of non-renormalization theorems.
Abstract
It has been argued that a certain large matrix model may provide a non-perturbative definition of -theory. This model is the truncation to dimensions of ten-dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory. It is crucial to this identification that terms with four derivatives in the effective action for the quantum mechanics should not be renormalized. We offer a perturbative proof of this result.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNumerical methods in inverse problems · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics · Differential Equations and Boundary Problems
