Is the Black Hole Complementarity principle really necessary?
N. Itzhaki

TL;DR
This paper argues that the black hole complementarity principle may not be necessary by demonstrating that the S-matrix approach leads to a semi-classical metric where infalling particles do not cross the horizon but reach null infinity.
Contribution
It challenges the necessity of the black hole complementarity principle by deriving a semi-classical metric from the S-matrix ansatz.
Findings
Infalling particles do not cross the horizon in the semi-classical metric.
Particles reach null infinity instead of the singularity.
The S-matrix approach implies a different horizon behavior.
Abstract
We show that the S-matrix ansatz implies a semi-classical metric such that a freely falling test particle will not cross the horizon in its proper time. Instead of reaching the singularity it will reach .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
