Spatial Geometry of Non-Abelian Gauge Theory in \(2 + 1\) Dimensions
Michel Bauer, Daniel Z. Freedman

TL;DR
This paper reformulates 2+1 dimensional SU(2) Yang-Mills theory using gauge-invariant geometric variables, revealing a connection to topological field theory and addressing issues with degenerate configurations.
Contribution
It introduces a gauge-invariant geometric framework for 2+1D Yang-Mills theory, linking physical states to topological field theory and analyzing degenerate configurations.
Findings
Wave functionals factorize into phase and geometric parts.
Degenerate configurations lead to infinite energy density.
Topological field theory provides insights into gauge theory wave functionals.
Abstract
The Hamiltonian dynamics of \(2 + 1\) dimensional Yang-Mills theory with gauge group SU(2) is reformulated in gauge invariant, geometric variables, as in earlier work on the \(3 + 1\) dimensional case. Physical states in electric field representation have the product form \(\Psi_{\mathrm{phys}} [E^{a i}] = \exp ( i \Omega [ E ] / g ) F [G_{ij}]\), where the phase factor is a simple local functional required to satisfy the Gauss law constraint, and \(G_{ij}\) is a dynamical metric tensor which is bilinear in \(E^{a k}\). The Hamiltonian acting on \(F [ G_{ij} ]\) is local, but the energy density is infinite for degenerate configurations where \(\det G (x)\) vanishes at points in space, so wave functionals must be specially constrained to avoid infinite total energy. Study of this situation leads to the further factorization \(F [G_{ij} ] = F_c [ G_{ij} ] \mathcal R [ G_{ij} ]\), and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
