Why some stars seem to be older than the Universe?
Matti Pitk\"anen

TL;DR
This paper proposes that the apparent age paradox of some stars being older than the Universe can be explained by a TGD-based cosmology where photons exist in different phases, affecting age estimates and Hubble constant measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a TGD cosmology framework explaining the age paradox and varying Hubble constants through photon phases and propagation differences.
Findings
Vapour phase photons can cause overestimation of star ages.
Different photon phases lead to varying Hubble constant measurements.
Possible explanation for large redshifts outside the horizon.
Abstract
There is some experimental evidence that some stars are older than the Universe in General Relativity based cosmology. In TGD based cosmology the paradox has explanation. Photons can be either topologically condensed on background spacetime surface or in 'vapour phase' that is progate in as small surfaces. The time for propagation from A to B is in general larger in condensate than in vapour phase. In principle observer detects from a given astrophysical object both vapour phase and condensate photons, vapour phase photons being emitted later than condensate photons. Therefore the erraneous identification of vapour phase photons as condensate photons leads to an over estimate for the age of the star and star can look older than the Universe. The Hubble constant for vapour phase photons is that associated with and smaller than the Hubble constant of matter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomy and Astrophysical Research · Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · History and Developments in Astronomy
