YANG-MILLS-HIGGS versus CONNES-LOTT
Bruno IOCHUM, Thomas SCH\"UCKER

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that all Connes-Lott models can be expressed as Yang-Mills-Higgs models through variable transformations, but not all Yang-Mills-Higgs models correspond to Connes-Lott models, highlighting their relationship and differences.
Contribution
It establishes a connection between Connes-Lott and Yang-Mills-Higgs models, providing necessary conditions and illustrating the relationship with examples.
Findings
Every Connes-Lott model can be formulated as a Yang-Mills-Higgs model.
Not all Yang-Mills-Higgs models are Connes-Lott models.
Necessary conditions for a Yang-Mills-Higgs model to be a Connes-Lott model are identified.
Abstract
By a suitable choice of variables we show that every Connes-Lott model is a Yang-Mills-Higgs model. The contrary is far from being true. Necessary conditions are given. Our analysis is pedestrian and illustrated by examples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
