Difficulties in Formulating an imaginary-time formalism of temporal axial gauge at finite T
S.M.H. Wong

TL;DR
This paper explores the challenges of developing an imaginary-time formalism in temporal axial gauge at finite temperature, highlighting fundamental issues with energy conservation that hinder its formulation.
Contribution
It critically examines the difficulties in extending the imaginary-time formalism in temporal axial gauge, revealing fundamental obstacles not present in the real-time approach.
Findings
Energy conservation fails in the imaginary-time formalism
Unusual representation of the longitudinal field causes issues
Formulation challenges hinder studying Debye screening in QCD
Abstract
Following the successful construction of the finite T real-time formalism in temporal axial gauge, we attempt to further study the equivalent new imaginary-time formalism of James and Landshoff based on the same Hamiltonian approach in the hope that it will provide the answer to Debye screening in QCD. It turns out that, unlike in the real-time case, energy conservation does not hold because of the unusual representation of the longitudinal field forced upon by the Hamiltonian formulation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
