
TL;DR
This paper compares different definitions of black hole entropy, highlighting differences between the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy and statistical-mechanical entropy, and explains the universality of the former.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinction between thermodynamic and statistical definitions of black hole entropy and explains why Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is universal.
Findings
Bekenstein-Hawking entropy differs from statistical-mechanical entropy.
Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is universal, independent of field properties.
The paper provides an explanation for the universality of Bekenstein-Hawking entropy.
Abstract
In the talk different definitions of the black hole entropy are discussed and compared. It is shown that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy (defined by the response of the free energy of a system containing a black hole on the change of the temperature) differs from the statistical- mechanical entropy (defined by counting internal degrees of freedom of a black hole). A simple explanation of the universality of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy (i.e. its independence of the number and properties of the fields which might contribute to ) is given.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
