Why Don't We Have a Covariant Superstring Field Theory?
Martin Cederwall

TL;DR
This paper reviews the longstanding challenge of developing a covariant quantum superstring theory with manifest Lorentz and supersymmetry, analyzing various quantization methods and their algebraic structures, and highlighting unresolved issues.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of different covariant quantization approaches for superstrings, emphasizing twistorial variables and their algebraic frameworks, and identifies key open problems.
Findings
Twistorial approaches offer promising algebraic structures for covariant superstring quantization.
Several quantization methods have distinct advantages and disadvantages.
Unsolved problems remain in achieving a fully consistent covariant superstring theory.
Abstract
This talk deals with the old problem of formulatingn a covariant quantum theory of superstrings, ``covariant'' here meaning having manifest Lorentz symmetry and supersymmetry. The advantages and disadvantages of several quantization methods are reviewed. Special emphasis is put on the approaches using twistorial variables, and the algebraic structures of these. Some unsolved problems are identified.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Advanced Topics in Algebra
