On the Geometric Interpretation of N = 2 Superconformal Theories
Paul Aspinwall, Brian Greene

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the geometric interpretation of N=2 superconformal theories, resolving key issues and identifying their geometric content, including insights into mirror symmetry and phase diagram features.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the phase structure of N=2 superconformal theories, offering a natural resolution to the mirror symmetry of rigid Calabi-Yau manifolds.
Findings
Identified geometric content of N=2 superconformal theories
Resolved the mirror of rigid Calabi-Yau manifolds
Highlighted subtle features via models with unusual phase diagrams
Abstract
We clarify certain important issues relevant for the geometric interpretation of a large class of N = 2 superconformal theories. By fully exploiting the phase structure of these theories (discovered in earlier works) we are able to clearly identify their geometric content. One application is to present a simple and natural resolution to the question of what constitutes the mirror of a rigid Calabi-Yau manifold. We also discuss some other models with unusual phase diagrams that highlight some subtle features regarding the geometric content of conformal theories.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
