N=4 Versus N=2 Phases, Hyperk\"Ahler Quotients and the 2D Topological Twist
Marco Billo', Pietro Fre'

TL;DR
This paper compares N=2 and N=4 supersymmetric gauge theories in two dimensions, focusing on their phases, topological twists, and applications to ALE-manifolds, highlighting the unique features of the N=4 case.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of N=4 supersymmetric models, their phases, topological twists, and applications to ALE-manifolds, expanding understanding beyond the N=2 case.
Findings
N=4 theories have a single phase, unlike N=2 theories with multiple phases.
The paper clarifies the topological twists and their relation to gravitational instantons.
Application to ALE-manifolds shows how to study their deformations using topologically twisted theories.
Abstract
We consider N=2 and N=4 supersymmetric gauge theories in two-dimensions, coupled to matter multiplets. In analogy with the N=2 case also in the N=4 case one can introduce Fayet-Iliopoulos terms.The associated three-parameters have the meaning of momentum-map levels in a HyperK\"ahler quotient construction. Differently from the N=2 case, however, the N=4 has a single phase corresponding to an effective -model. There is no Landau-Ginzburg phase. The main possible application of our N=4 model is to an effective Lagrangian construction of a -model on ALE-manifolds. We discuss the A and B topological twists of these models clarifying some issues not yet discussed in the literature, in particular the identification of the topological systems emerging from the twist. Applying our results to the case of ALE-manifolds we indicate how one can use the topologically twisted theories…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
