Is 2d Turbulence a Conformal Turbulence?
Gregory Falkovich, Amihay Hanany

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the application of conformal field theory to 2D turbulence, arguing that minimal models do not adequately describe the universal turbulent solutions with constant fluxes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that conformal minimal models are insufficient for modeling 2D turbulence with constant fluxes, challenging previous theoretical approaches.
Findings
Conformal minimal models cannot produce general turbulent solutions.
These models fail to account for constant fluxes of vorticity integrals.
The analysis questions the applicability of conformal approaches to 2D turbulence.
Abstract
A critical analysis of the conformal approach to the theory of 2d turbulence is delivered. It is shown, in particular, that conformal minimal models cannot give a general turbulent solution, which should provide for constant fluxes of all vorticity integrals of motion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
