Magnetic Fields and Passive Scalars in Polyakov's Conformal Turbulence
G. Ferretti, Z. Yang

TL;DR
This paper explores conformal field theory models of two-dimensional turbulence, focusing on magnetic fields and passive scalars, and predicts energy distribution behaviors that can be tested astrophysically.
Contribution
It identifies specific minimal models within conformal turbulence that account for magnetic and passive scalar dynamics, highlighting differences from previous models.
Findings
Magnetic energy dominates at larger distances, violating equipartition.
Different minimal models arise at high magnetic Reynolds numbers.
Predictions are applicable to astrophysical phenomena.
Abstract
Polyakov has suggested that two dimensional turbulence might be described by a minimal model of conformal field theory. However, there are many minimal models satisfying the same physical inputs as Polyakov's solution (p,q)=(2,21). Dynamical magnetic fields and passive scalars pose different physical requirements. For large magnetic Reynolds number other minimal models arise. The simplest one, (p,q)=(2,13) makes reasonable predictions that may be tested in the astrophysical context. In particular, the equipartition theorem between magnetic and kinetic energies does not hold: the magnetic one dominates at larger distances.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
