\delta-expansion and self-consistent calculation
Paulo F.Bedaque, Ashok Das

TL;DR
This paper compares delta-expansion, self-consistent calculations, and minimal sensitivity methods in simple theories, finding that minimal sensitivity yields more accurate results at each order.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the principle of minimal sensitivity provides more precise results than delta-expansion and self-consistent methods in simple theories.
Findings
Minimal sensitivity method outperforms delta-expansion and self-consistent calculations in accuracy.
Order-by-order comparison shows increasing accuracy with minimal sensitivity.
The study clarifies the relative effectiveness of these approximation techniques.
Abstract
We compare results from --expansion, in simple theories, with self--consistent calculations as well as calculations involving the principle of minimal sensitivity. We show that the latter methods give relatively more accurate results order by order.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Stochastic processes and financial applications · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
