S-Matrix Equivalence Theorem Evasion and Dimensional Regularisation with the Canonical MHV Lagrangian
James H. Ettle (1), Chih-Hao Fu (2), Jonathan P. Fudger (1), Paul R., W. Mansfield (2), Tim R. Morris (1) ((1) School of Physics, Astronomy,, University of Southampton, UK (2) Department of Mathematical Sciences,, University of Durham, UK)

TL;DR
This paper explores how the canonical MHV Lagrangian's change of variables leads to contributions that evade the equivalence theorem, affecting scattering amplitude calculations, and introduces a dimensional regularisation scheme to handle these effects.
Contribution
It demonstrates the ET evasion in the canonical MHV Lagrangian and develops a D-dimensional regularisation method to accurately compute scattering amplitudes.
Findings
ET evasion contributes to tree-level and one-loop amplitudes.
Dimensional regularisation enables consistent quantum MHV calculations.
Rearrangement of light-cone Yang-Mills contributions matches ET-evading terms.
Abstract
We demonstrate that the canonical change of variables that yields the MHV lagrangian, also provides contributions to scattering amplitudes that evade the equivalence theorem. This `ET evasion' in particular provides the tree-level (-++) amplitude, which is non-vanishing off shell, or on shell with complex momenta or in (2,2) signature, and is missing from the MHV (aka CSW) rules. At one loop there are ET-evading diagrammatic contributions to the amplitudes with all positive helicities. We supply the necessary regularisation in order to define these contributions (and quantum MHV methods in general) by starting from the light-cone Yang-Mills lagrangian in D dimensions and making a canonical change of variables for all D-2 transverse degrees of freedom of the gauge field. In this way, we obtain dimensionally regularised three- and four-point MHV amplitudes. Returning to the one-loop…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
