Lorentz violation and perpetual motion
Christopher Eling, Brendan Z. Foster, Ted Jacobson, and Aron C. Wall

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that theories violating Lorentz invariance with multiple propagation speeds conflict with black hole thermodynamics, challenging the possibility of perpetual motion machines in such frameworks.
Contribution
It extends previous results by showing that Lorentz violation with multiple speeds conflicts with the generalized second law, even without assuming specific interactions beyond gravity.
Findings
Lorentz violating theories with multiple speeds violate black hole entropy laws
Classical energy extraction analogous to Penrose process can decrease black hole entropy
Large black holes can avoid instabilities that threaten perpetual motion
Abstract
We show that any Lorentz violating theory with two or more propagation speeds is in conflict with the generalized second law of black hole thermodynamics. We do this by identifying a classical energy-extraction method, analogous to the Penrose process, which would decrease the black hole entropy. Although the usual definitions of black hole entropy are ambiguous in this context, we require only very mild assumptions about its dependence on the mass. This extends the result found by Dubovsky and Sibiryakov, which uses the Hawking effect and applies only if the fields with different propagation speeds interact just through gravity. We also point out instabilities that could interfere with their black hole {\it perpetuum mobile}, but argue that these can be neglected if the black hole mass is sufficiently large.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
