The disappearing $Q$ operator
H. F. Jones, R. J. Rivers

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in functional integral formulations of non-Hermitian quantum theories, the $Q$ operator is unnecessary for expectation values, with the connection to Hermitian theories encoded via external sources, contrasting with the operator formalism.
Contribution
It shows that the $Q$ operator is not needed in functional integral approaches, providing a new perspective on non-Hermitian quantum theories and their Hermitian equivalents.
Findings
The $Q$ operator is subliminal in functional integrals.
Expectation values are computed without the $Q$ operator.
The relation to Hermitian theories is via external sources.
Abstract
In the Schroedinger formulation of non-Hermitian quantum theories a positive-definite metric operator must be introduced in order to ensure their probabilistic interpretation. This operator also gives an equivalent Hermitian theory, by means of a similarity transformation. If, however, quantum mechanics is formulated in terms of functional integrals, we show that the operator makes only a subliminal appearance and is not needed for the calculation of expectation values. Instead, the relation to the Hermitian theory is encoded via the external source . These points are illustrated and amplified for two non-Hermitian quantum theories: the Swanson model, a non-Hermitian transform of the simple harmonic oscillator, and the wrong-sign quartic oscillator, which has been shown to be equivalent to a conventional asymmetric quartic oscillator.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
