Consistent Pauli Sphere Reductions and the Action
H. Lu, C.N. Pope, K.S. Stelle

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether consistent Pauli sphere reductions in supergravity can be equivalently derived from higher-dimensional equations of motion or the action, revealing that substitution into the action may not always yield correct lower-dimensional theories.
Contribution
It demonstrates through examples that substituting the reduction ansatz into the higher-dimensional action does not always produce the correct lower-dimensional theory, highlighting gaps in understanding.
Findings
Substituting the ansatz into equations of motion is reliable for Pauli reductions.
Substituting into the action can fail to produce the correct lower-dimensional theory.
Explicit examples show the limitations of action-based reduction approaches.
Abstract
It is a commonly held belief that a consistent dimensional reduction ansatz can be equally well substituted into either the higher-dimensional equations of motion or the higher-dimensional action, and that the resulting lower-dimensional theories will be the same. This is certainly true for Kaluza-Klein circle reductions and for DeWitt group-manifold reductions, where group-invariance arguments guarantee the equivalence. In this paper we address the question in the case of the non-trivial consistent Pauli coset reductions, such as the S^7 and S^4 reductions of eleven-dimensional supergravity. These always work at the level of the equations of motion. In some cases the reduction ansatz can only be given at the level of field strengths, rather than the gauge potentials which are the fundamental fields in the action, and so in such cases there is certainly no question of being able to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
