The Story of \cal O: Positivity constraints in effective field theories
Alejandro Jenkins, Donal O'Connell

TL;DR
This paper introduces a straightforward approach to determine which operators in effective field theories must have positive coefficients due to causality constraints, clarifies existing positivity arguments, and explores implications for various theories.
Contribution
It presents a new simple method for identifying causality-imposed positivity constraints and clarifies the connection between superluminal perturbations and instabilities in effective theories.
Findings
Operators with positive coefficients are linked to causality.
Superluminal perturbations relate to instabilities near the cutoff.
Implications for ghost condensate and Lorentz-violating theories.
Abstract
We propose a simple method for identifying operators in effective field theories whose coefficients must be positive by causality. We also attempt to clarify the relationship between diverse positivity arguments that have appeared in the literature. We conjecture that the superluminal perturbations identified in non-positive effective theories are generally connected to instabilities that develop near the cutoff scale. We discuss implications for the ghost condensate, the chiral Lagrangian, and the Goldstone bosons of theories with spontaneous Lorentz violation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
