Can D-Branes Wrap Nonrepresentable Cycles?
Jarah Evslin, Hisham Sati

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether D-branes can wrap nonrepresentable cycles in string theory compactifications, providing examples where such branes carry K-theory charges despite the cycles' nonrepresentability.
Contribution
It presents the first explicit examples of Freed-Witten anomaly-free D6-branes wrapping nonrepresentable cycles in specific string theory backgrounds.
Findings
One example D6-brane carries a K-theory charge.
Another example D6-brane does not carry a K-theory charge.
Nonrepresentable cycles can be wrapped by D-branes with anomaly cancellation.
Abstract
Sometimes a homology cycle of a nonsingular compactification manifold cannot be represented by a nonsingular submanifold. We want to know whether such nonrepresentable cycles can be wrapped by D-branes. A brane wrapping a representable cycle carries a K-theory charge if and only if its Freed-Witten anomaly vanishes. However some K-theory charges are only carried by branes that wrap nonrepresentable cycles. We provide two examples of Freed-Witten anomaly-free D6-branes wrapping nonrepresentable cycles in the presence of a trivial NS 3-form flux. The first occurs in type IIA string theory compactified on the Sp(2) group manifold and the second in IIA on a product of lens spaces. We find that the first D6-brane carries a K-theory charge while the second does not.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
