Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion
Allan Adams, Nima Arkani-Hamed, Sergei Dubovsky, Alberto Nicolis,, Riccardo Rattazzi

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that certain low-energy effective field theories with specific sign conditions cannot be embedded in UV-complete theories satisfying analyticity, linking IR superluminality to fundamental non-locality and constraining models like DGP gravity.
Contribution
It reveals a fundamental IR obstruction to UV completion based on analyticity constraints, connecting superluminal fluctuations to the signs of irrelevant operators in effective theories.
Findings
Negative sign operators lead to superluminal fluctuations.
IR breakdown of effective theories indicates non-locality.
Constraints exclude certain models like DGP from UV completion.
Abstract
We argue that certain apparently consistent low-energy effective field theories described by local, Lorentz-invariant Lagrangians, secretly exhibit macroscopic non-locality and cannot be embedded in any UV theory whose S-matrix satisfies canonical analyticity constraints. The obstruction involves the signs of a set of leading irrelevant operators, which must be strictly positive to ensure UV analyticity. An IR manifestation of this restriction is that the "wrong" signs lead to superluminal fluctuations around non-trivial backgrounds, making it impossible to define local, causal evolution, and implying a surprising IR breakdown of the effective theory. Such effective theories can not arise in quantum field theories or weakly coupled string theories, whose S-matrices satisfy the usual analyticity properties. This conclusion applies to the DGP brane-world model modifying gravity in the IR,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
