Why Randall-Sundrum Scenarious are not Compatible with an Orbifolded Fifth Dimension
P. Castelo Ferreira

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that Randall-Sundrum scenarios with a ${ m Z}_2$ orbifold symmetry are mathematically inconsistent without boundary actions, challenging their integration into higher-dimensional theories like string theory.
Contribution
It clarifies the inconsistency of Randall-Sundrum models with orbifold symmetry due to regularity issues at the orbifold planes, emphasizing the need for boundary actions.
Findings
Randall-Sundrum models lack regularity at orbifold planes without boundary actions.
Such models are mathematically inconsistent in higher-dimensional frameworks.
The paper discusses potential directions to address these issues.
Abstract
We show the (already known) fact that Randall-Sundrum scenarious although compatible with a orbifold symmetry cannot hold regularity of the fields at the orbifold planes in the absence of boundary actions and respective jumps of the fields. This makes the models mathematical inconsistence and invalidate the inclusion of such models in a higher dimensional theory such as string theory. For completeness we point out some directions already in the literature and in progress.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
