Comparing two definitions for gauge variations of dielectric D-branes
Joke Adam

TL;DR
This paper compares two gauge variation definitions for dielectric D-branes, establishing their equivalence for R-R variations but not for NS-NS variations, confirming the naive variation as valid.
Contribution
It demonstrates the equivalence of two gauge variation definitions for R-R fields and clarifies the validity of the naive variation for NS-NS fields in non-Abelian D-brane actions.
Findings
R-R variations are invariant under both definitions.
Naive NS-NS variation is the only valid definition.
The action's invariance under R-R variations is proven.
Abstract
We compare two definitions of gauge variations in the case of non-Abelian actions for multiple D-branes. Equivalence is proven for the R-R variations, which shows that the action is invariant also under the easier, naive variation. For the NS-NS variations however, the two definitions are not equivalent, leaving the naive definition as the only valid one.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
