On Evaluation of Nonplanar Diagrams in Noncommutative Field Theory
Yi Liao (ITP, Leipzig)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the evaluation of nonplanar diagrams in noncommutative field theory, revealing that their UV behavior is more complex and less predictable than previously thought, especially in Minkowski spacetime, raising questions about renormalizability.
Contribution
It demonstrates that standard evaluation prescriptions can lead to ambiguous and physically unjustified results in noncommutative theories, challenging prior assumptions about UV finiteness of nonplanar diagrams.
Findings
In Minkowski spacetime, NC phases can worsen UV divergences.
Different evaluation prescriptions yield identical results in ordinary theories, but not necessarily in NC theories.
New UV non-regular terms can be complex and harm unitarity.
Abstract
This is a technical work about how to evaluate loop integrals appearing in one loop nonplanar (NP) diagrams in noncommutative (NC) field theory. The conventional wisdom says that, barring the ultraviolet/infrared (UV/IR) mixing problem, NP diagrams whose planar counterparts are UV divergent are rendered finite by NC phases that couple the loop momentum to the external NC momentum \rho^{\mu}=\theta^{\mu\nu}p_{\nu}. We show that this is generally not the case. We find that subtleties arise already on Euclidean spacetime. The situation is even worse in Minkowski spacetime due to its indefinite metric. We compare different prescriptions that may be used to evaluate loop integrals in ordinary theory. They are equivalent in the sense that they always yield identical results. However, in NC theory there is no a priori reason that these prescriptions, except for the defining one built in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
