
TL;DR
This paper discusses PT-symmetric quantum electrodynamics, clarifying that the C operator used for unitarity is not related to charge conjugation, challenging previous assumptions in the field.
Contribution
It provides a new interpretation of the C operator in PT-symmetric quantum field theory, distinguishing it from charge conjugation.
Findings
The C operator is not equivalent to charge conjugation in PT-symmetric QED.
Clarification of the role of the C operator in unitarity.
Implications for the understanding of symmetries in PT-symmetric quantum theories.
Abstract
In the context of the PT-symmetric version of quantum electrodynamics, it is argued that the C operator introduced in order to define a unitary inner product has nothing to do with charge conjugation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
