Response to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton'
N. B. Pomeroy
TL;DR
This paper addresses and clarifies specific points raised in comments on the authors' previous work regarding the U(2) ADHM two-instanton solution, aiming to resolve misunderstandings or inaccuracies.
Contribution
It provides a detailed response to critiques of the U(2) ADHM two-instanton, clarifying the original findings and defending the validity of the solution.
Findings
Clarification of the U(2) ADHM two-instanton properties
Resolution of misunderstandings from previous comments
Reinforcement of the original solution's validity
Abstract
We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories