Dynamical symmetry breaking and the Nambu-Goldstone theorem in the Gaussian wave functional approximation
V. Dmitrasinovic, Issei Nakamura

TL;DR
This paper investigates the implications of the Nambu-Goldstone theorem within a Gaussian wave functional framework, revealing how additional NG bosons can emerge as composite states in certain symmetry-breaking scenarios.
Contribution
It extends the understanding of NG bosons in relativistic field theories by analyzing their emergence as composites in a Gaussian approximation, especially in cases with residual symmetries.
Findings
NG bosons can exceed the number of elementary fields in symmetry-breaking scenarios.
New NG bosons may appear in channels without corresponding elementary particles or CDD poles.
Application to the 't Hooft sigma model demonstrates the method's relevance to realistic chiral symmetry breaking.
Abstract
We analyze the group-theoretical ramifications of the Nambu-Goldstone [NG] theorem in the self-consistent relativistic variational Gaussian wave functional approximation to spinless field theories. In an illustrative example we show how the Nambu-Goldstone theorem would work in the O(N) symmetric scalar field theory, if the residual symmetry of the vacuum were lesser than O(N-1), e.g. if the vacuum were O(N-2), or O(N-3),... symmetric. [This does not imply that any of the "lesser" vacua is actually the absolute energy minimum: stability analysis has not been done.] The requisite number of NG bosons would be (2N - 3), or (3N - 6), ... respectively, which may exceed N, the number of elementary fields in the Lagrangian. We show how the requisite new NG bosons would appear even in channels that do not carry the same quantum numbers as one of N "elementary particles" (scalar field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
