A Critique of Pure String Theory: Heterodox Opinions of Diverse Dimensions
T. Banks (SCIPP, U.C. Santa Cruz, Nhetc, Rutgers U.)

TL;DR
This paper critiques string theory and M Theory, challenging conventional assumptions, and proposes a new framework for understanding quantum de Sitter space, emphasizing black hole dominance in high energy physics.
Contribution
It offers a heterodox perspective on M Theory, questioning background independence and vacuum states, and introduces a novel approach to quantum de Sitter space.
Findings
Black hole dominance in high energy physics
Critique of background independent formulations
Proposal for a quantum theory of de Sitter space
Abstract
I present a point of view about what M Theory is and how it is related to the real world, which departs in certain crucial respects from conventional wisdom. I argue against the possibility of a background independent formulation of the theory, or of a Poincare invariant, Supersymmetry violating vacuum state. A fundamental assumption is black hole dominance of high energy physics. Much of this paper is a compilation of things I have said elsewhere. I review a crude argument for the critical exponent connecting the gravitino mass and the cosmological constant, and propose a framework for finding a quantum theory of de Sitter space.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
