Holonomy and Symmetry in M-theory
Chris Hull

TL;DR
This paper explores the role of holonomy in classifying supersymmetric solutions of 11-dimensional supergravity, emphasizing the importance of an $ ext{SL}(32, ext{R})$ symmetry in M-theory and its implications for supersymmetry and fermionic degrees of freedom.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the holonomy of solutions must be within $ ext{SL}(32, ext{R})$ and discusses the necessity of this symmetry for incorporating fermions in M-theory.
Findings
Holonomy is contained in $ ext{SL}(32, ext{R})$ for supersymmetric solutions.
Flux solutions have specific holonomy properties.
Including fermions in M-theory requires a local $ ext{SL}(32, ext{R})$ symmetry.
Abstract
Supersymmetric solutions of 11-dimensional supergravity can be classified according to the holonomy of the supercovariant derivative arising in the Killing spinor condition. It is shown that the holonomy must be contained in . The holonomies of solutions with flux are discussed and examples are analysed. In extending to M-theory, account has to be taken of the phenomenon of ` supersymmetry without supersymmetry'. It is argued that including the fermionic degrees of freedom in M-theory requires a formulation with a local symmetry, analogous to the need for local Lorentz symmetry in coupling spinors to gravity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
